
I spent the morning at an excellent Christian school, giving a talk during the high-school chapel and then in religion class. My challenge to the students was to figure out why they believe what they believe - to honestly question the basis of their faith and see how firm it really is.
The discussion today reminded me of a question I've been asked many times. That is, "How can intelligent people that have the capacity to think critically - how can they believe in something they cannot see?"
They've asked me to come back and help the students answer that question - to help them map out a path to maintain their faith in spite of the onslaught of doubt and skepticism coming their way at the secular university.
I can't wait to dig into it with them! I think I'll start with something like this.
A paradigm is:
"A set of assumptions, concepts, values, and practices that constitutes a way of viewing reality for the community that shares them, especially in an intellectual discipline."
Here's a piece of my "Christian paradigm". At the highest, most abstract level - this is where I start.
First off, I always play the percentages.
I spent most of my adult life in the hard sciences. And pure science, as you know, is all about hard facts.
But I can't prove (to myself or to you) that orthodox Christianity is the one right way. And I refuse to hold a set of beliefs just because my mother or some churchman told me to.
So what's a thinking man to do?
Well, I tend to go with that which has the highest percentage chance in my (admittedly peculiar!) mind of being "true". That goes for just about everything in my life.
So why then do I hold fast to orthodox Christianity? Because I think it has the highest percentage chance of being the truth.
Am I 100% sure? Nope - I won't be until I'm standing in New Jerusalem.
But you know what? The list of things I'm 100% sure of is really, really short.
I think I'm about 99% sure of Christianity, and that's fine for me.
I'm just being honest here - I think most Christians would fear such an admission. Not me. And I should tell you that my trust in this approach to my faith has led to what many people would call "extreme acts".
For example, I cashed out my interest in my software development business and moved my family to another part of the state so I could teach Christian theology. I took a 90% pay cut - so you've gotta know I'm either insane, or I really really believe this stuff (maybe both!).
My confidence lies in the historical person of Jesus for the following reasons:
a) Anyone who believes he never existed isn't thinking hard enough. He certainly
existed.
b) Anyone who believes he was not substantially who he said he was, or that he did not substantially perform the acts the Gospels record that he did - isn't properly examining the evidence.
I say that because there were too many opposing interests (Sanhedrin, Pharisees, Romans) that would've proudly and loudly exposed any substantially fraudulent view of the early Church.
That didn't happen. No Roman produced his dead body - no Jewish leader said, "All that never happened". Again, they'd have done so if they could've.
So in my mind, Jesus was who he said he was, and Jesus did what the Gospels record he did.
Is there, in my mind, a small chance that a wholesale fabrication got by the Roman and Jewish antagonists of the first century? Yes there is.
Yeah, there's a chance (!) that the disciples stole Jesus' body out from under the noses of the burly Roman soldiers guarding the tomb (with a huge rock rolled in front of the entrance). But not a very big chance!
Let's get silly for a second. Being generous to the naysayers - what if there's a 5% chance of wholesale fabrication? Even 5% against leaves me with 95% in favor - and that'll do for me.
By the way - just so you know - the atheists, evolutionists, postmoderns, Muslims, Hindus and the rest - they're offering no better odds!
So here's the fundamental premise upon which I've built my worldview, and by which I strive to live my life each and every day.
"Since the evidence indicates that Jesus indeed existed, and substantially did and said what the gospels say he did and said, he is without peer in the pantheon of spiritual leaders. No one else comes close.
As such, Jesus is worthy of my complete devotion. I must spend my life seeking to understand him, his words and his actions in the proper context.
I must try and understand his paradigm - to understand what he believed about the past and about the future - and then I must believe the same."
Now, if you want to find out what's so special about what Jesus "did and said" that causes me to say that "no one else comes close" - well, you'll need to read the New Testament for yourself! :)